Missed Free Throws and… Game-Fixing?

by: Mickey Ingles (originally posted on Spin.Ph)

FOUR-FOR-twenty-nine from the free throw line. Blowing wide open lay-ups. Lackluster play. 

No, I’m not talking about the last time my high school buddies and I attempted to play basketball. I’m referring to yesterday’s professional basketball game between Lapu-Lapu and Siquijor in the Pilipinas VisMin Cup bubble in Cebu.

Lowlights of the game have made the rounds online. They’re cringeworthy, to say the least. Switching shooting hands in between free throw attempts would’ve been acceptable, if there was a reasonable explanation for it. And clanking two straight free throws off the board without the ball even touching the rim? 

No, Mr. Commentator, that’s not a slippery ball. 

It smells suspiciously like something else.

The Games and Amusements Board (GAB) is currently investigating the game to determine if something fix-y was going on. Depending on the results of the investigation, charges of game-fixing could be leveled against the parties involved.

Game-fixing is a crime defined under Philippine Law. Presidential Decree No. 483 defines game-fixing as “any arrangement, combination, scheme or agreement by which the result of any game, races or sports contests shall be predicted and/or known other than the basis of the honest playing skill or ability of the players or participants.”

The law recognizes that sports and games should be won or lost because of the skill or ability of the players. Hence, if anyone manipulates the game such that the result is predetermined, then what you have is the criminal offense of game-fixing.

P.D. 483 also criminalizes point-shaving and game machination.

Point-shaving is similar to game-fixing, except that the intent of the schemes is to deliberately limit points or scores to influence the result of a game. An example of point-shaving is deliberately missing free throws in order to maintain a betting line or spread.

Game machination is more of a catch-all, where the use of any other fraudulent, deceitful, or unfair means to influence the results of games, races, or sports contests is considered a crime. 

If charged and found guilty under P.D. 483, the players can face jail time of up to six years and a fine of P2,000. Yes, you read that right: P2,000. Don’t laugh, P2,000 was a big amount way back in 1974 when P.D. 483 was issued.

What’s not a laughing matter is toying with sports integrity, especially when other athletes have been stuck at home eager to play the game the right way but are unable to because of the pandemic.

We eagerly await the results of the GAB investigation.

Mickey Ingles is the editor-in-chief of Batas Sportiva. If this post looks familiar, then check our archives to know why!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s